One list of record. Forecasts you can defend.

LeadHootz keeps contacts enriched, campaigns deduped, and sends inside windows so pipeline reports are not arguing with a bounced CSV.

Why forecasts feel worse than the CRM looks

Industry pattern: data decays, tools disagree, and sends happen outside policy. We do not claim a +25 point forecast lift. We claim a cleaner input.

Data decay

~30%/year typical

Re-verify emails before a big enroll. Failed rows stay visible.

Silos

List ≠ CRM ≠ inbox

One Lead List, share links for reviewers, API for the system of record.

Bounce & reputation

Silent killers

Caps, windows, stop-on-reply. Unibox surfaces fails instead of hiding them.

Who already got worked

Double-send risk

Campaigns skip already-enrolled contacts. Keep one list of record.

Clean → align → observe

01

Clean

Waterfall enrichment, visible no-matches, bounce rows in Unibox. Credits only when we find a match.

02

Align

Sales, marketing, and agencies work the same list. Stakeholders review on a share link — no extra seat to approve names.

03

Observe

Live Activity is the ticker. Campaign Progress is the weekly. Unibox is the thread. Ops can pause, swap mailbox, or retry enrichment without a war room.

RevOps engine vs spreadsheets and point tools

Capability LeadHootz Patch-work stack Why it matters
Hygiene Waterfall + visible fails Manual CSV Forecast inputs stop rotting in silence
Dedupe Skip already-worked on enroll Hope and filters No double-sends across teams
Observability Live Activity, Unibox, Progress Weekly export Same-day view of what sent and what bounced
CRM / API Same credits as the app Zapier glue and a second bill One enrichment truth
Policy Windows, caps, GDPR Uncapped tools Protects domains and the audit conversation

Plays nice with your stack

  • Gmail
  • Outlook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twilio SendGrid
  • CRM
  • Public API

Questions for this motion

What is LeadHootz for RevOps?

The operating layer: lists, enrichment, campaign enroll, send policy, Unibox, and API — so sales and marketing are not running three versions of the truth.

Who is it for?

Anyone who owns data quality, sending policy, or pipeline reporting — boutique agencies through in-house RevOps. Enterprise adds SSO and pooled credits.

Can it integrate with our CRM?

Yes. Campaign CRM connect and the public API for people and company enrich on the same credit pool.

Does it include enrichment and outreach?

Yes. That is the point of one list of record. Enrichment is credit-only-on-success. Outreach respects windows and stop-on-reply.

Is it only for enterprises?

No. Solo founders and small teams run the same agents. Enterprise is for directory login, bulk seats, and pooled workspace credits.

Give the number a list it can trust

Connect CRM or the API, set windows, and stop arguing about whose export is right.